Showing posts with label the four rs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the four rs. Show all posts

Monday, July 2, 2012

Q&A with the man who seeks to unlock the secrets of humanity

Mapping the brain could unlock the secrets of human individuality, but with billions of neural networks per cubic millimeter, the task ahead for scientists is immense. One of these scientists is Sebastian Seung, tipped as a rising star of neuroscience. He trained as a physicist at Harvard University, but later joined MIT as professor of computational neuroscience. In his first book, Connectome: How the Brain’s Wiring Makes Us Who We Are, he argues that our individuality lies in our connectome, the complex map of our neurons.

By Ian Sample  /  The Tapei Times Observer Monday, June 18, 2012
 
 
 

Uber brain nerd Sebatian Seung.

Ian Sample: What does a connectome look like?

Sebastian Seung: A connectome is a map of the brain as a network of neurons. If you want a mental picture, think of the flight maps you see in the back of airline magazines, except replace each city with a neuron and each flight by a connection between neurons. Now scale up the map to include 100 billion cities and 10,000 flights per city. That would be your connectome.

Sample: How do you map a connectome?

Seung: One way is to cut really thin slices of brain and image every slice. You then have to identify every neuron and trace its path through the chunk of brain. You need high-resolution images and automated ways to analyze them. I am proposing a long-term goal, to get to a point where we can do an entire human connectome, but that requires decades of exponential innovation. Just by doing small pieces of brain, we will learn a tremendous amount about how the brain works.

Sample: What might it tell us?

Seung: The brain is behind the really big questions we have: Who am I, what is my identity? What is that based on? If memories are encoded in connectomes, your personality might be in your connectome. If that is the case, that is then the basis of your uniqueness as a person. That is why I have this slogan: “You are your connectome.”

When some people think of a wiring diagram for the brain, they imagine an electronic device and a diagram that never changes, but the connectome changes when you have an experience and it is been thought for a while that is how the trace of a past experience is stored in your brain. The hypothesis is that minds differ as connectomes differ.

Sample: How does the brain change?

Seung: I define the “four Rs” of connectome change as: reweighting, reconnection, rewiring and regeneration. Reweighting is a change in the strength of an existing connection. Reconnection means the creation of an entirely new connection or the elimination of an old one. Rewiring is growth and retraction of branches of neurons. Regeneration is the creation or elimination of entire neurons.

We know these four kinds of change happen. What we do not know is how exactly they are related to learning and memory. We do not know the extent to which they continue in adulthood and old age. Reweighting occurs all your life, that is why you are a lifelong learner. Reconnection was thought to stop at adulthood, but now there is evidence it keeps going. All the debates are over rewiring and regeneration.

Sample: You talk about “connectopathies.”

Seung: This is the theory that certain psychiatric disorders are caused by miswiring of the brain or connectopathies. They are pathological patterns of connections. One of the most puzzling aspects of certain psychiatric disorders is the lack of a clear neuropathology.

If you take the brain of a person who died from Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease, it is clear that the neurons are degenerating and dying. We do not have cures, but at least we can see something wrong with the brain. But if you look at someone who had schizophrenia, you cannot see a distinguishing neuropathology. That is why for many years people denied that schizophrenia was a brain disorder. The neurons might be healthy, but maybe they are connected in an abnormal way and we just cannot see it.

Sample: Where do you start?

Seung: The bottleneck becomes analyzing the images. Suppose we can image a cubic millimeter of brain in two weeks. To trace the neurons through those images manually we estimate would take 100,000 years. For 1mm3.

The challenge is to speed up that process. One of the ways is to automate the process, but artificial intelligence (AI) is not perfect. It can speed people up, but it cannot replace them. Even if AI does 99 percent of the work, that would only reduce 100,000 years to 1,000 years.

Sample: So you crowdsource the job.

Seung: My lab is launching a citizen science project, which is trying to recruit volunteers on the Internet to interact with the AI to map out connections. Angry Birds consumes 600 years of human attention a day.

I joke that if we could make mapping the connectome a game that was 1 percent as fun as Angry Birds, we would be done with a cubic millimeter in two days. We need a lot of people to do that cubic millimeter, but our AI is based on machine learning, so the people who interact with it are also teaching it.


The super-popular Angry Birds game.

That is the only way we will ever do a cubic millimeter of brain and scale up to do the entire brain. We need to get on this curve of exponential innovation.

Image from the Human Connectome Project. See link below.


http://www.humanconnectomeproject.org/

Of Magic Bullets and the Connectome

An 1822 illustration of Der Freischütz depicting the opening scene with Max and Kilian


I wrapped Sebastian Seung's Connectome yesterday, It's a wonderfully comprehensive, yet easy to grasp tour-de-force dissertation on neuroscience, biology, and more.

His chapter on psychopharmacology, Changing, has several interesting tidbits which I will reprise here.

 I found out the oft-used drug term "magic bullet" comes from a 1940 Warner Bros. film, Dr. Ehrlich's Magic Bullet, the title perhaps in turn inspired by a plot device in Carl Maria Von Weber's opera Der Freishutz. In this opera Max sells his soul to the devil for seven magic bullets which are guaranteed to hit their mark. Dr. Paul Erlich first imagined, and then discovered chemicals that killed bacteria, but spared other cells, like a magic bullet that flew unerringly to its target. This has been the ideal for medical treatments ever since --  the "magic bullet" that hits its target and avoids "side effects."

Historically, most psychoactive drugs have been discovered by chance, as "side effects" themselves. The first antipsychotic, chlorpromazine (Thorazine), started out as a chemical die for the textile industry. In 1891 Dr. Erlich discovered that some of the chemicals in the same phenothiazine class could be used to treat malaria. After giving the drug to psychiatric patients as a sedative, doctors came to realize that it specifically reduced symptoms of psychosis. By the end of the fifties chlorpromazine had swept through the psychiatric hospitals of the world.


1940 Theatrical Poster

Then iproniazid, originally developed for tuberculosis, was found to have an antidepressant side effect. Imipramine was developed as a "me-too" drug in the footsteps of Thorazine. It failed as an antipsychotic, but seemed to relieve depression. Thus began the use of the tri-cyclic antidepressants.

After these accidental discoveries, attempts were made to develop an actual "rational" drug discovery, based on a modern understanding of biology and neuroscience.

According to well-known theories dating from the sixties, certain disorders are caused by surplus or deficiencies of neurotransmitters levels. So came the development of fluxotine (Prozac) and the other "me-too" SSRIs, said to be the only real psychopharmacolical advances since the "Golden Age" of the fifties.




But there is a problem with the neurotransmitter theory. Fluxotine affects serotonin levels immediately, yet it lifts mood only after several weeks. What could account for this long delay?

According to one speculation, the serotonin boost causes other changes in the brain over the longer term. Perhaps it's these changes that relieve depression, but what exactly could they be? Neuroscientists have looked for effects of fluxotine of the four "Rs" (reconnection, rewiring, regeneration, and reweighting), and found that it increases the creation of new synapses, branches, and neurons in the hippocampus. Moreover as Mr. Seung mentioned in his discussion of rewiring, fluxotine restores ocular dominance plasticity in adults, possibly by stimulating cortical rewiring. This doesn't prove that the drug's antidepressant effects are caused by connectome change, but it has opened the minds of neuroscientists to the idea.


It's time to practice the four Rs -- reconnect, rewire, reweight, and regenerate.