Showing posts with label addiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label addiction. Show all posts

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Recommended Bill Moyers DVD Set: Moyers On Addiction: Close to Home








I picked this two-DVD Bill Moyers set up at the used bookstore at a bargain price -- one dollar. Sure, why not check it out? Upon viewing this material, the neuroscience, psychology of emotions, and the social aspects of healing addiction seem to have much in common with severe anxiety disorder treatment.

This set is well worth watching for an understanding of treating these widespread chronic problems that can relapse. Five in-depth episodes, plus bonus materials.

"Moyers on Addiction: Close to Home"

This five-part series takes a look at the science, treatment, prevention, and politics of addiction. The compulsive need for alcohol, nicotine and illegal drugs affects people of every class, race, and profession. Few Americans have been spared its impact -- either directly or through a friend, co-worker or loved one. Despite its prevalence, there is no clear picture of addiction in America. Hoping to raise awareness about this issue, Moyers reports on a disease that has affected his own family as well as millions of Americans. (1998)

"The Hijacked Brain"
March 29, 1998 | Moyers on Addiction: Close to Home
Bill Moyers attempts to unravel the mysteries of the addicted mind.

"Portrait of Addiction"
March 29, 1998 | Moyers on Addiction: Close to Home
Nine men and women -- all recovering from drug and/or alcohol addiction -- tell their stories. Their candid testimony leaves no doubt that addiction can happen to anyone -- and so can recovery.

"Changing Lives"
March 30, 1998 | Moyers on Addiction: Close to Home
BIll Moyers visits innovative treatment programs, including the one that helped his son.

"Next Generation"
March 31, 1998 | Moyers on Addiction: Close to Home
Addiction is a cycle, passing from generation to generation. Many anti-drug programs have little effect, but there's still hope for children.

"The Politics of Addiction"
March 31, 1998 | Moyers on Addiction: Close to Home
Moyers talks with people working to change American drug policy from a criminal-justice approach to a public-health model.






Tuesday, October 7, 2014

Physical Harm From Recreational Drugs Chart

After putting it off for too long, I had another dreaded colonocopy screening done recently. Chugging the salty "prep" is usually the worst part of these procedures, but this time I had a different clean out drink --- it required drinking only two liters (in two divided doses) instead of the usual gallon, and was much more tolerable, in terms of taste and results. 

During my pre-procedure anesthesia conference, I mentioned that I have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and so I received a milder than a "total knock out" dose of proponol,  so as not to compromise my breathing -- in the form of a "cocktail" of proponol and ketamine.

The ketamine induced some mild, colorful pattern-like hallucinations, and was very pleasant.  Although a child of the fifties and sixties, I have taken a hallucinogen before, and at a low, monitored dose the visual effects were quite striking, and my overall mood was highly elevated. The "doors of perception" were opened a bit. From earlier reading, I recalled that low doses of ketamine are sometimes used to treat severe depression and suicidal ideation

When I researched ketamine online, I found out that it is often used as an animal tranquilizer, and also has long been used and abused as a "recreational drug" by dance and light show ravers and clubbers -- with results somewhat similar to Ectasy. I can understand how ketamine use could become addictive. Apparently, a tolerance to the drug is quickly built up, and the addiction becomes much, much harder to feed. Here are some charts from a Wiki entry on Ecstasy (MDMA) on the comparative risk factors of the various "recreational drugs."



From Wiki:

Comparison of the perceived harm for 20 popular recreational drugs from a poll among medical psychiatrists specialized in addiction treatment. Ecstasy is ranked the 16th most addictive and 12th most harmful of 20 popular recreational drugs.



Enjoyable as it was, I think I'll wait the recommended five years for my next go-around to experience it again. Still and yet, it made for a much more interesting procedure.


Ketamine 'Exciting' Depression Therapy


By James Gallagher, Health and Science reporter, BBC News

Ketamine offers an avenue of research into a field that has struggled to find new treatments for depression.

The illegal party drug ketamine is an "exciting" and "dramatic" new treatment for depression, say doctors who have conducted the first trial in the UK.

Some patients who have faced incurable depression for decades have had symptoms disappear within hours of taking low doses of the drug.

The small trial on 28 people, reported in the Journal of Psychopharmacology, shows the benefits can last months.

Experts said the findings opened up a whole new avenue of research.

Depression is common and affects one-in-10 people at some point in their lives.

Antidepressants, such as prozac, and behavioural therapies help some patients, but a significant proportion remain resistant to any form of treatment.

A team at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust gave patients doses of ketamine over 40 minutes on up to six occasions.

Eight showed improvements in reported levels of depression, with four of them improving so much they were no longer classed as depressed.

Some responded within six hours of the first infusion of ketamine.

Lead researcher Dr. Rupert McShane said: "It really is dramatic for some people, it's the sort of thing really that makes it worth doing psychiatry, it's a really wonderful thing to see."

He added: "[The patients] say 'ah this is how I used to think' and the relatives say 'we've got x back'."

Dr McShane said this included patients who had lived with depression for 20 years.

The testing of ketamine has indentified some serious side-effects

The duration of the effect is still a problem.

Some relapse within days, while others have found they benefit for around three months and have since had additional doses of ketamine.

There are also some serious side-effects including one case of the supply of blood to the brain being interrupted.

Doctors say people should not try to self-medicate because of the serious risk to health outside of a hospital setting.

"It is exciting, but it's not about to be a routine treatment as where we need to be going is maintaining the response... it's not about to replace prozac."

However, it does offer a new avenue of research into a field that has struggled to find new treatments for depression.

'Something chemical'

David Taylor, professor of psychopharmacology at the Maudsley Hospital, London, told the BBC: "In these kinds of patients, spontaneous remission almost never happens, people going to these clinics are at the end of the road."

"It shows that depression is something chemical, that it can be reversed with chemicals, it dispenses for once and for all that you can just pull your socks up."

"What restricts it is the potential for disturbing psychological adverse effects and the route by which is given - intravenous - does restrict it to a small number of people."

He said in the future drug companies would develop a chemical that had the benefits, but without the side-effects, and that could be taken by something such as an inhaler.

The Home Office is reclassifying ketamine in the UK to be a class B drug, although it is already used in medicine for the treatment of back pain and as an anaesthetic.


Monday, November 25, 2013

Kicking Facebook...


Where, oh where, in the web-o-sphere have I been? Sad to say, some while back, when my Blog posts dried up, it was because I became totally hooked on Facebook. It became all-too addicting -- reveling in those FB “likes” and keeping up to date with what merry mischief my sociable friends are up to. Having a “smart phone” had a lot to do with it. FB is a total “time hog,” because I have to constantly correct, edit, and re-correct all the auto-changes and word substitutions triggered by each of my slang-heavy quips.

Everything FB critics warned the public about attention and focus is true. I stopped reading books, blogging, and watching video. I imagine it’s because a little squirt of super-pleasurable dopamine is released with the “social acceptance” of each “like” feedback notice. Pretty soon, the susceptible are behaving much like online poker addicts – hooked on maintaining the flow of those neurotransmitters of joy. Guilty.

On FB, I also started “stretching out” from my savant-like “hyper-focus” on original comic book art at work, and I was totally grooving on sharing images of my favorite landscape paintings and illustration art pieces. I estimate I am only using about 35% of my “total art knowledge” for my occupation as the world’s greatest comic art cataloger -- so I got carried away with the uninhibited fun of my new “free-range” art celebrations. Old art history networks, long dormant, fired up again.  Unfortunately, a friend pointed out that my numerous FB posts had become like a “RSS feed into the brain of Don Mangus.” At least they weren’t political diatribes.

All this time away from my Blogs will not be a total loss, though. I’m going to transfer some of the more relevant topics I covered on FB over to these more “universal” blogs.

I’m very interested in the idea of using social networks to help heal anxiety disorders, share information, and be a positive influence in general. Used properly, in moderation, FB could be a helpful adjunct to the blog.

And so, I vow to start reading real books again and unplug some. It’s time to reign in my recent FB addiction.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Stanton Peele: The Meaning of Addiction Has Changed -- Addiction is Not a Characteristic of Things



Hey, kids, comics! A classic Al Feldstein drug cover for EC.



Writing as editor of MedPage Today, the redoubtable George Lundberg* confidently (and briefly) declared: "All drugs are habit-forming, but only a subset of psychoactive drugs can produce psychological and physical dependence, tolerance, and withdrawal symptoms when taken away, the usual definition of addiction."

George, are you behind times! The new definition of addiction in the American Psychiatric Association's forthcoming manual doesn't discriminate -- any substance may be addictive.

Moreover, the manual (DSM-5), soon to be released, will for the first time include a non-substance addiction (gambling), and may include a catch-all "behavioral addiction -- not otherwise specified" category. That last bit is meant to indicate, well, that people may become addicted to anything. This is noted psychiatrically when a person seeks out an experience, ritual, or reward to the exclusion -- and detriment -- of all other goals and activities. The measure of addictiveness is how absorbing, compelling, and harmful to the person an involvement is. Nothing else matters.

While this may catch in Dr. Lundberg's throat, as it does for many -- "Why, then, anything can be addictive -- email, my morning coffee, or my spouse/lover!" -- others are jumping rapidly onto this bandwagon. One way to do so is to note that any captivating activity or experience shows up in the brain, to wit:
A team of scientists led by Nora Volkow at the National Institute on Drug Abuse have used positron emission tomography (PET) scans to show that even when cocaine addicts merely watch videos of people using cocaine, dopamine levels increase in the part of their brains associated with habit and learning. Dr. Volkow's group and other scientists have used PET scans and functional magnetic resonance imaging to demonstrate similar dopamine receptor derangements in the brains of drug addicts, compulsive gamblers and overeaters who are markedly obese.
There are a few things wrong with this formulation:

1) Do the addicts whose brains glow on seeing something actually pursue that object? Always? When do they or don't they? Why or why not?

2) Do others who use cocaine or who enjoy eating and gambling (or -- let's get down to it -- sex) within normal constraints also show dopamine activity in the brain when presented with images of these things? Then why aren't they addicts? Or are they, but controlled addicts?

3) Can virtually anything be powerful enough for some people to show powerful neuroresponsiveness?

Then why are we typecasting only a subset of things as addictive? Lundberg makes this mistake by telling us only some drugs are addictive, but not which ones (reminds you of the Republicans' budget cuts, doesn't it?). He implies that pharmaceuticals aren't addictive ("Everybody I know takes psychoactive drugs, except maybe some Mormons, Seventh-Day Adventists, and the like"), but then maybe he hasn't read I'm Dancing as Fast as I Can (tranquilizer addiction) or hasn't been paying attention as prescribed painkillers rise to the top of the addictiveness list. (Dr. Lundberg, are marijuana and caffeine addictive?)

To quote Joseph Conrad in Victory, "There are more magic potions than your commonplace magician can imagine." Virtually anything can be addictive for the "right" person at the "right" time -- one of stress or disorientation, when that experience holds out significant and powerful associations for the person, when the person is not inclined or able to be restrained, when all consequences are damned. Addiction, you see, is not a label to be applied to specific things, but to an involvement a person creates in time and space.

Lundberg is the former editor of JAMA. He was unceremoniously fired, a move for which he successfully sued -- but that's a totally different story.

For more by Stanton Peele, click here.

For more on addiction and recovery, click here.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Brain Circuits and Addiction


Brain circuits and drug use

What is the nature of addiction?

Amy Winehouse was a terrific talent and one of the favorite recording artists of all time. She also struggled with substance abuse. To what extent remains largely unknown but her death has fueled debate as to the precise nature of drug addiction and how it should be addressed by society as a whole.

In other words, why do some people behave in the often self-destructive manner in which they do? And why are people addicted to drugs in the first place?  How, if at all, might they be helped?

Now, you might think that this is a spectacularly hard task to delve into the neuroscience of addiction try to shed some light. Surely, drugs of abuse (such as amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, alcohol and nicotine) have a broad range of actions that are wholly dissimilar from each other? Well, that is partly true, but when it comes to their addictive properties, they have more in common than you might think.

What constitutes addiction?

Addiction, as most will know, develops as a result of chronic exposure to a particular substance. People who are addicted to a drug show similar patterns of behaviour. These include:

1. A compulsion to seek the drug

2. An inability to control the amount of drug consumption

3. A negative emotional state when subjected to periods of withdrawal

Neuroscientists have sought to understand the neural mechanisms underlying these behaviours for generations and emerging from these studies is the concept of the ‘reward circuit’ that seems to be involved in the development and maintenance of drug addiction.  In fact, research on the medial forebrain pleasure circuit may be entering a golden age of discovery.

Now, a lot of neuroscience (indeed any science) is about gradually building up a picture from fragments of information. In most cases, that information may not even come from human subjects but from animal models. That means that current ideas regarding drug addiction are far from unequivocal, but from looking at the correlations between how the rodent brain and human brain are altered during the development of drug addiction, we can make careful assumptions about what might be the general rule.
You see, the brain behaves a little bit like a factory, with different departments responsible for producing a certain sort of feeling or behaviour. This means that there are anatomically distinct areas that are concerned with happiness, memory, movement and so on. This is (as ever) an oversimplification, as it is usually the concerted action of several brain regions that lead to emergence of a particular thought or action. However, it is useful to think of the brain in this way, particularly when analysing how brain circuits are altered in drug users.

The reward circuit

The reward circuit consists of several brain regions that are heavily interconnected; each with distinct – but related – functionality. These include the nucleus accumbens (a brain region that is extremely well documented for its involvement in drug addiction), the ventral tegmental area, the amygdala, the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus and the insula, among others.

Dysfunction in each of these areas has been implicated in the onset and maintenance of drug-addiction, each area being responsible for a slightly different facet of the drug-addicted mental state.

The nucleus accumbens: pleasure

Now, the nucleus accumbens is known as the reward center of the brain. Largely because in various different experimental paradigms, subjects that report that they are experiencing reward show increased activity in this area. This can be whilst taking drugs of abuse or simply eating, engaging in sexual activity or indeed anything associated with pleasurable reward.

All drugs of abuse raise the level of a chemical known as dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and it is this elevation in dopamine (initiated in different ways by different drugs) that is responsible for the feeling of euphoria associated with drug intake.

However, persistent activation of the nucleus accumbens leads to the development of drug addiction, primarily due to persistent changes in the level of dopamine, which leads to an alteration in how people respond to otherwise rewarding stimuli. Put simply, after disruption of the dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens, people get less satisfied with things that aren’t their drugs of choice. Furthermore, people derive progressively more pleasure from the drug in question, exacerbating the effect.

The amygdala: fear

On the flip side of the coin, the amygdala is a region of the brain situated right next to the nucleus accumbens but is often associated with feelings of fear and anxiety.
As opposed to the positive reinforcement created by the nucleus accumbens, it is during withdrawal that the amygdala seems to have its largest role. Basically, as access to the drug is taken away, stress-related hormones are increased in the amygdala which can lead (at least partially) to the negative feeling associated with withdrawal.

The hippocampus: memory

The hippocampus is an area of the brain that is associated with learning and memory as well as the ability to perform tasks requiring spatial navigation, such as finding your way around a building. It is also important for ‘contextual-conditioning’, meaning that it enables the mind to establish links between an environmental cue (a nightclub, for example) and a memory (such as taking a drug.)

Activation of the hippocampus is implicated in initiating cue-induced drug-seeking behaviour. Indeed, it has been shown that cue-induced craving of drugs (eg. the feeling of needing a drink in a pub or a cigarette with a cup of coffee) is associated with an increase in activity in the hippocampus (as well as the amygdala) in humans, indicating that normal memory function may be being encroached upon by drugs of abuse.

The prefrontal cortex: decision

The prefrontal cortex consists of several subdivisions including the orbitofrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These areas have a variety of different functions but are often described as being imperative in carrying out decision-making processes in response to internal/external-cues, a process known as executive function.

It is believed that the activity of the prefrontal cortex is disrupted in subjects who are addicted to drugs. This may go some way to explaining why drug users often make poor decisions regarding drug intake (ie. pursuing a drug whilst fully aware of the negative impact drug intake will have on them and the people around them.)

What goes on in the brain of a drug addict

So…
As complicated as that may have sounded, it represents a gross oversimplification of what actually goes on in the mind of a drug addict. I simply wanted to introduce you to some of the concepts that are emerging as a result of neuroscientific research and give you a flavor of what is to come in future posts. As I move through my journey into drug addiction, I will make constant references to the reward circuit and its components and so an introduction was necessary to familiarise you with the brain’s machinery. -- Dr. Paul


Dr. Paul is a graduate from the University of Bristol and the author of Dr Paul’s Brain Talk, a neuroscience-related magazine. Dr. Paul believes that over the coming decades, neuroscience research will begin to have a greater impact on our lives and he aims to bring the findings of this fascinating field to the general public, in words they can understand.